You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Listening to a few different commentators yesterday I thought the following were interesting points:
- The plan was conceived as part of "operation save big dog" - ie it's roots are in capturing the news cycle
- The government have known all along that they could have improved the strength of their case by signing a treaty with Rwanda with enough teeth to hold them to account for deficiencies in their asylum system. They chose not to do this and have lost (probably) as a result.
It's almost like it's a joke that's got out of hand.
Basically though, I think it's been kept live by 3 different camps:
- those who want it for performative effect
- those who see it as a strategic move to exit the ECHR
- those who are so fucking basic they thing it's a credible plan were they only allowed to do it
- The plan was conceived as part of "operation save big dog" - ie it's roots are in capturing the news cycle
hugo7
This whole Rwanda situation is just getting more and more absurd. Why can’t the government just accept is a horrific plan and benefits no one. It must be costing a fortune.
But no even after it was ruled unlawful. They’re still going for it.
🫶🏻 cunts gonna cunt.