You are reading a single comment by @aggi and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I'd suggest that it going to court does make it contentious, although not illegal.
I don't think anyone is suggesting there aren't a plurality of views but it just seems that given Labour's recent history of anti-semitism it isn't a sensible way to push the envelope. The same sentiment could have been expressed without that antagonistic phrasing.
And the Dutch courts recently ruled it to be not antisemitic and count as protected free speech: https://elsc.support/news/victory-from-the-river-to-the-sea-is-protected-speech-dutch-court-rules
Almost like there’s a plurality of views around this, but the Israeli position is better represented than the Palestinian one.