You are reading a single comment by @aggi and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
The article suggests that it's in relation to this:
Prince Charles’s former aide quits as charity boss amid cash-for-honours claims
So cash being through various people to make the bribes look less obvious.
Chuckles was worried that he's look complicit. Which he probably was, even if only by turning a blind eye.
I'm not sure if I get this story.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/24/anthony-pratt-said-royal-advisors-wanted-payments-to-prince-charles-to-stop-to-avoid-appearance-of-anything
Was the guy just giving money to the Prince of Wales (not related charities or anything) for personal use? Surely that isn't a thing.