You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Here's an opinion piece in Haaretz blaming Netanyahu for the attack. He's been funding and strengthening Hamas in order to scupper the two state solution https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-10-11/ty-article/.premium/netanyahu-needed-a-strong-hamas/0000018b-1e9f-d47b-a7fb-bfdfd8f30000

    Opinion | Why Did Netanyahu Want to Strengthen Hamas? Netanyahu
    developed a destructive, warped political doctrine that held that
    strengthening Hamas at the expense of the Palestinian Authority would
    be good for Israel

    There’s no doubt that in the immediate and short term, the reasons
    behind the disgraceful mishap of inconceivable scope that led to the
    Hamas army’s unhindered takeover of more than 20 Israeli communities
    near the Gaza border that dark Simchat Torah day involve an
    embarrassing military and intelligence failure.

    Of course, they also involve the criminal neglect of the affairs of
    state by an indicted prime minister who is feverishly preoccupied with
    finding ways to escape trial. And the price is the destruction of the
    existential foundations of Israeli society and of the country.

    The purpose of the doctrine was to perpetuate the rift between Hamas
    in Gaza and the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

    But the deep roots of the feasibility of the murderous assault by the
    Islamist nationalist phalangists from the prison that is Gaza on
    Israeli citizens should actually be sought in an earlier period of
    Benjamin Netanyahu’s time in office as prime minister – prior to his
    criminal trial and his alliance with nationalist Kahanists and the
    judicial coup, back when he was considered “level-headed” and
    “rational” and “responsible.”

    That’s because since he took office as prime minister a second time in
    2009, that same Netanyahu developed and advanced a destructive, warped
    political doctrine that held that strengthening Hamas at the expense
    of the Palestinian Authority would be good for Israel.

    The purpose of the doctrine was to perpetuate the rift between Hamas
    in Gaza and the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank. That would
    preserve the diplomatic paralysis and forever remove the “danger” of
    negotiations with the Palestinians over the partition of Israel into
    two states – on the argument that the Palestinian Authority doesn’t
    represent all the Palestinians.

    That flawed strategy turned Hamas from a minor terrorist organization
    into an efficient, lethal army with highly trained, dehumanized
    stormtroopers, bloodthirsty killers who mercilessly slaughtered
    innocent Israeli civilians including women, children and the elderly.

    This is solidlydocumented. Between 2012 and 2018, Netanyahu gave Qatar
    approval to transfer a cumulative sum of about a billion dollars to
    Gaza, at least half of which reached Hamas, including its military
    wing. According to the Jerusalem Post, in a private meeting with
    members of his Likud party on March 11, 2019, Netanyahu explained the
    reckless step as follows: The money transfer is part of the strategy
    to divide the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Anyone who
    opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state needs to support the
    transfer of the money from Qatar to Hamas. In that way, we will foil
    the establishment of a Palestinian state (as reported in former
    cabinet member Haim Ramon’s Hebrew-language book “Neged Haruach”, p.
    417). In an interview with the Ynet news website on May 5, 2019,
    Netanyahu associate Gershon Hacohen, a major general in reserves,
    said, “We need to tell the truth. Netanyahu’s strategy is to prevent
    the option of two states, so he is turning Hamas into his closest
    partner. Openly Hamas is an enemy. Covertly, it’s an ally.”

    In a tweet on May 20, 2019, Channel 13 quoted Egyptian President Hosni
    Mubarak saying: “Netanyahu isn’t interested in the two-state solution.
    Rather, he wants to separate Gaza from the West Bank, as he told me at
    the end of 2010.” Mubarak said that during an interview with the
    Kuwaiti daily Al-Anba.

    It’s worth dwelling on the horrifying significance of these remarks.
    An Israeli prime minister himself knowingly and calculatingly
    cultivated one of Israel’s most bitter and fanatic foes, an enemy
    whose declared aim is to destroy the country. And he did it to prevent
    the horror scenario from his standpoint of a return to
    Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Netanyahu recklessly gambled on the
    lives of Israelis, and in fact, last Shabbat, more than 1,000 of them
    paid the price of that foolish gamble with their lives.

    “This government has blood, rivers of blood, on its hands,” Iris Leal
    justifiably wrote in Haaretz this week, (Haaretz, Oct. 8). But one
    should acknowledge and clearly and explicitly state that, on the
    Israeli side, the person bearing the fundamental responsibility for
    the killing of more than a thousand Israelis by Hamas is Benjamin
    Netanyahu – its covert ally, as Maj. Gen. Cohen put it, but also an
    effective and essential one for the Palestinian religious nationalist
    terrorist organization, at least between 2012 and 2019.

    Thanks to the funneling of millions of Qatari dollars to Gaza, with
    Netanyuhu’s repeated approval as part of a deliberate and malicious
    policy aimed at nothing other than burying the two-state solution,
    Hamas acquired inordinate military capabilities within a relatively
    short time. And that resulted in the current situation, which as I
    write, has taken the lives of about 1,000 Israelis.

    With the end of the hostilities, when it comes, one may hope that a
    state commission of inquiry to investigate the events surrounding the
    Simchat Torah massacre – an unprecedented slaughter of Jews in their
    own country – would be convened. One of the main issues that the
    commission should investigate is Netanyahu’s long-term policy of
    strengthening Hamas.

  • Really interesting peice. Divide and conquer makes sense.

    One thing I'm not sure about though is the conclusion of allowing funds thorough. Approval for funds ≠ wanting funds to arm Hamas.

    Limiting the extent of a humanitarian crisis helps to reduce outside interference and pressure on Israel.

About

Avatar for hugo7 @hugo7 started