-
To push what into public acceptance? The bulk of the groups on that list are either Islamist or white supremacist, as far as I can see (admittedly I've not read the whole way down).
If you wanted a sensible debate about this, there are better ways than snidey comments suggesting that those who hold a different view to you are racist
-
The way we deal with non white humans. Why is my local council giving £500p/m to house a Ukrainian seeking refuge from occupation but not Palestinians?
I think that people are racist. I’m not saying it’s their fault but we often default to the same conclusion in geo-politics which is that the white man and his actions are just.
How many civilians (my apologies, enemy combatants) have just the U.K. killed in the past century? It’s a footnote on the bottom of a journalistic piece about how the brown man has taken up arms as resistance in their own country.
Debate then.
Either you believe coloured people are more likely to be terrorists or this list is based on geopolitical interests rather than just skin colour.
To push this into public acceptance we need to push the narrative coloured people are terrorist and white people are either freedom fighters or mentally ill.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/proscribed-terror-groups-or-organisations--2/proscribed-terrorist-groups-or-organisations-accessible-version
Either that or it’s just a massive coincidence that the vast majority of terrorist organisations are coloured.