-
Say? No. Imply? well yeah maybe...
All starts with, I'm guessing, your position that the state shouldn't exist at all. So therefore all actions to defend it are illegitimate, all actions taken to attack it are legitimate. Even if they are actions taken by members of a disgusting women-hating death cult....Rah Rah Hamas eh? Doing all that lovely justified killing'n brutalising...
Well, according to the UN, the country does exist and people born there/living there may naturally be involved in defending it from attack and might even feel proud of doing that. Surprising ?
JaRyder-
Wait, are you framing Israel as the oppressed in this?
-
I don't believe Hamas' actions in this instance are justified but have you questioned why Hamas even exists? Here I'll even quote it for you
"Hamas was founded in 1987,[h] soon after the First Intifada broke out, as an offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood[43] which in its Gaza branch had previously been nonconfrontational toward Israel and hostile to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).[44] Co-founder Sheik Ahmed Yassin said in 1987, and the Hamas Charter affirmed in 1988, that Hamas was founded to liberate Palestine, including modern-day Israel, from Israeli occupation and to establish an Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.[45]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HamasAnd a 25 year old wanting to defend their country eh, from what exactly? From retaliation of the people they're oppressing? She went to a music festival 2 miles from the border so they can't have seemed a big threat. The last time Israel was invaded was 1973 so not exactly in living memory for her.
Thanks for avoiding the question entirely btw.
Not/random-user
Sumo
Did I say anyone deserved to be "brutalised by a women-hating death cult"? No.
Here's a question for you, if a soldier is killed while being part of an occupying force, is that justified? What if that soldier was a conscript rather than a volunteer? What if they were proud of their actions?