Personally I'd like them to have to demolish it to prove the point. That said I'm sure many of the issues with the building can be rectified retrospectively, the windows, façade etc can be changed, balconies can be moved to become properly accessible as was on planning permission. It would be cheaper than demolishing it.
Personally I'd like them to have to demolish it to prove the point. That said I'm sure many of the issues with the building can be rectified retrospectively, the windows, façade etc can be changed, balconies can be moved to become properly accessible as was on planning permission. It would be cheaper than demolishing it.