Ahem...Hambini?

Hah! Just from a quick scan through that last page in this thread, it seems he doxxed someone? Is that in relation to the "keep banging your hairdresser" references, or something else?

From the look of all the righteous loathing, it seems like he's earnt that page dedicated to him.

He reams so many people/brands that one of them took "action" and try to cancel him.

I've read the T&C's of the domain Service Provider for lols and the person really need to be stupid to do something like this, whoever did it is asking for legit legal action but tbh, resizing images not proportionally should give people prison time straight up, no questions asked!

(He released a video recently that goes over the website and speaks about it the page etc.)

Cba

You’re smart enough to see that doxxing someone isn’t a good idea. But not smart enough to see that he’s a charlatan and a vile one at that. Weird.

reams

try to cancel him

10/10 I am a fool for taking this obvious bait.

try to cancel him

Good luck with that. YouTube may have deleted some content, but they seem unwilling to close his account. Given the trivial scale, his employer is probably not going to sack him for using company assets for his own use, even assuming that's what's happening and they haven't given prior authority, although if they're not very progressive they might ask him to stop. The tax allegations don't amount to anything, and even if they did, as Private Eye routinely points out, paying tax is based on the honesty box system and HMRC has neither the time nor the inclination to go after every tiny bit of avoidance.

I'm guessing he'll keep doing his thing until he oversteps the mark in a serious way again, he's plenty thick and arrogant enough to do that. Maybe next time it won't result only in "words of advice"

I am not saying that is not a good idea. Who possesses morality to say that?

I don't think is good or bad idea to dox someone, I just think whoever did it should dox, if they wish, but in my "weird" opinion, that person should be smarter enough too to do it properly or just take the accountability that can represent. Is a internet drama, who cares, same old story of internet dramas and social medias...

What I really think is that people these days in general are hyper-sensitive to other's contrary opinions or the way they express them, maybe for lack of debate or lack of time-experience to agree disagrements.

If Hambini does it for clicks/likes/clout or not, is debatable, we do not know him, is up for each to watch it or not too.

@Nef
If you find him "vile" or "charlatan" is your view and I can't fucked with it, and I am ok with that too.

I can understand that some people find his way of expressing "too much" or may not agree with some of his stuff whatever they might be. That just means we know about them because he choose to show them to public and looks liked it worked because who hates/dislikes also knows about him, consumed his content. And as far as I am aware that is a win only for him.

Personally I like the technical insight that he provides when he talks about stuff that he SEEMS to know about.
(And I say "seems" because I do not have knowledge enough to judge his technical accuracy, but my "weird" brain tells me that his engeneering licensing would be at risk if he presents publicly some innacurate or false principle/theories on engeneering/manufacturing that could really put at risk his real career, and that's not YT BS)
I find unecessary too some of his comments and toxic/passive-agressive speech but I don't care, skip it/ignore. Extract the juice only!

( and by the way, all I wrote above was to give context to @Kimmo, not sure why people assumed I was taking any side lol )

Ride bikes

his engeneering licensing

 LOL

Do you want to develop your "LOL"?

No, do you want to develop your theme of "engineering licensing"? Is he chartered?

I can understand that some people find his way of expressing "too much" or may not agree with some of his stuff whatever they might be

I find unecessary too some of his comments and toxic/passive-agressive speech but I don't care, skip it/ignore. Extract the juice only!

Did you find it easy to ignore the Michelle Arthurs-Brennan situation?

I have a degree in aerospace engineering, I used to work in metal surface finishing for hydraulic landing gear, and used to NDT aerospace parts. I am also brown. Maybe I should start a YouTube channel.

I even designed a human powered aircraft and modelled it in Pro Engineer.

Where do I apply for my engineering licence?

No, What I said was:

...technical accuracy, but my "weird" brain tells me that his engeneering
licensing would be at risk if he presents publicly some innacurate...

This assuming what he claims is true or do you have anything that disproves otherwise?

...but, Doesn't even matter? why people get so focused on his academic andevours or professional charterism?

You might not like him or his atitude or even agree with him, but you have to recognise that all he does he tries to demonstrate and demystify (on his own way) how shit should be more QC'd/Produced in the industry from a performance and product quality standpoint.
...At least is how I perceive it.

Edit: last paragraph

Because if your argument is: “believe me, because here are my credentials”
And then those credentials prove to be fictional, it somewhat undermines your credibility.

And let’s be honest, even if he’s right about what he hyperbolises on about, he’s still a cunt.

@Nef I totally get it and I would remove all my words if was the case obviously, but who/what proves is fictional?

And let’s be honest, even if he’s right about what he hyperbolises on about, he’s still a cunt.

Subjective, but I know where you coming from.

I am not sure, but I can image that if you would use your technical knowledge to point out shit to stuff that is out there being sold as product and often well-stablished in the market, you'd get shit for being brown and also would someone create a shit website to dox you for anything you say.

I have no idea what happened in that field to be honest, there is way more interesting content on that matter to drink from than Hambini in that matter.

People take his personal views and internet in general too seriously.

Hambini could be the only correct person in the world like De Ceprio in Don't Look Up, except he's a sexist cunt so he can get fucked

As I said I have no idea what the episode was about but you writting DiCaprio name incorrectly can sound quite sexist these days.
Be careful. ahahha

Hey, you are employing time to discuss him on here, what's a little more to understand why he is repeatedly being accused of sexism and misogyny.

Go on, I bet you don't.

I find interesting from a social standpoint how people agregate around collective opinions.
What I do with my time is up to me and if you didn't read, I said that I don't really care about anything he says on anything that is not QC/Construction - I find it interesting as well I find other people who talk about many other topics, personally.

I admit, I have dificulty in understanding what do you imply about myself when you say:

Go on, I bet you don't.

I find interesting from a social standpoint how people agregate around collective opinions.

that's not the case here, he's always come across as an unlikeable cunt. I didn't even know about the sexism part but the man has behaved like a 15 year old on 4chan for years

that's not the case here, he's always come across as an unlikeable cunt.

I get where you coming from and I understand that he has a lot of people who hate him from his views and cannot seperate things, but thinking he is "unlikable" or "likable" is subjective to the perceiver.

I didn't even know about the sexism part but the man has behaved like a 15 year old on 4chan for years

I agree with you, I find his comments in videos I watched, exagerated and unnecessary to the actual centre-purpose of the videos he makes.

someone with way too much time and creepy personalty to do something like that to anyone.

https://ridewriterepeat.com/2022/01/26/six-bloopers-of-being-a-woman-in-the-cycling-industry/

The final onslaught  – published close to a year after the first incident – included two articles targeting not only me but also my husband. These listed our home address with photos of our house, analysis of the parking situation outside, plus screen shots showing routes I used for regular bike rides – alongside false allegations of driving offences based on pieced-together MOT records, false accusations of the use of anonymous online accounts, as well as an entirely fabricated story about my using “feminist extremism as a cover up” to hide my “infertility” and “multiple failed IVF treatments”.

but thinking he is "unlikable" or "likable" is subjective to the perceiver.

Yeah, really good point. The people who don't like women being abused and put in fear are just being selfish - they don't appreciate how many people just love that shit.

Do fuck off.

same, I don't appreciate that stuff either. I was refering to the fact that people like his way of commenting/reaming brands, as I said I do not know the sexism episode.