You are reading a single comment by @neu and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • In that article you linked

    "But Carrie Westgarth, a professor in human animal interactions at the University of Liverpool explains that there is no hard evidence to prove some breeds are naturally more aggressive than others" and in the context of the recent calls to ban XL Bullys, it's defending the breed by claiming it's not a problem.

  • I don't see how that's a defence of XL Bullys. I get that appeals to nuance are a way to downplay a particular issue, but I don't happen to see it in this case.

  • XL Bullys kill a bunch of people,
    There's calls to ban that specific breed,
    Person claims breeds don't matter because any dog can attack.

    How is that not a defence of the breed? They're saying it's not special in any way yet is the only one causing problems.

About

Avatar for neu @neu started