You are reading a single comment by @cyclotron3k and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
It's been done at least twice, and was in fact one of the earliest tags, first by @Sumo, but he got the old tag wrong, and then by @bq.
Objection, your honour. The facts of the case are that Sumo's attempt was invalid, and it was rightfully and robustly rejected by the bike tag community of the time. This, in turn, allowed BQ to get a tag in. The fact that BQ included a photo of the invalid tag in his effort is irrelevant.
It was done again a couple of years later, but I can't remember by whom.
The fact that the prosecution is presenting hearsay as evidence only serves to further highlight the weakness of their case. My client is innocent, and I move to have the case dismissed.
cyclotron3k
bq
Oliver Schick
It's been done at least twice, and was in fact one of the earliest tags, first by @Sumo, but he got the old tag wrong, and then by @bq. Here:
https://www.lfgss.com/comments/7901619/
https://www.lfgss.com/comments/7902262/
It was done again a couple of years later, but I can't remember by whom.