• What I mean is that we’re not searching for an absolute existential truth, so one person’s decision might be different from another’s and that’s ok. The cost / benefit / risk trade-off is personal and we can put our own choices across without having to convince others that they’re wrong. This isn’t Facebook last time I checked :)

    For myself I’d never put my child in a tag-along trailer for example as I don’t trust motor vehicles - almost all collisions I’ve been involved in have been me being rear ended by a car that wasn’t paying attention, and anyway I want to interact with my child whilst riding, so a front loading bike is my preference. Yet both tag-alongs and long tails have been suggested to OP.

    Same for suspension or ABS, the benefits may or may not outweigh the costs. It’s useful to hear that other rider’s kids aren’t that bothered about rough surfaces and maybe suspension isn’t always necessary. But remember that OP is asking about riding with infants / toddlers and specifically off-road.

  • I think that its more of a point of it being pointless versus costly. And im not sure I understand the longtails being bad for interacting with the kids? (not my experience at all)

About

Avatar for young_gun @young_gun started