• The coverage of this in the media has been completely lacking in context. The whole point of ULEZ is mentioned as a footnote, if it's mentioned at all. You'd think it was being introduced solely to inconvenience motorists, rather than because we're facing a massive health crisis.

  • You'd think it was being introduced solely to inconvenience motorists

    Isn't this the standard UK press argument against any changes to anything to do with roads?

  • There are people saying stuff like, ‘I have to scrap my car because it’s too polluting but if I pay £12.50 it’s no longer too polluting, it’s obviously a con/money raiser’.
    Completely ignoring the fact that a theoretical £12.50 has changed their behaviour and stopped a car journey.

About

Avatar for chris0 @chris0 started