• I often muse on the derision / scepticism of integrity levelled at architects. I know a lot of them and I just don’t see it . In 2023 it’s poorly remunerated as a profession - considering the length of training / hours / overall level of professional responsibility required. People don’t get into it for the money in my experience. Generally it’s smart(ish) kids who are creative and technical and like the idea of making a difference or at least shaping a bit of the near future in some way. Sure there’s the fashion and taste element, the intense competition and big egos - but some ego is a requirement to create present and ultimately sell a design .

  • Is it in relation to their integrity though?

    Thinking through some common complaints, a lot are around not considering certain practicalities like costs. Sometimes I think it's a bit unfair as they aren't a QS, but then other times you so hear e.g.s where they come across as not being too fussed about the budget... at which you can't help but wonder if it's a tactical move to do something cool to win the bid then let the client sack off bits latest to bring the cost back down.

    So yeah maybe it is integrity.

  • The integrity thing - more about the stereotype that architects always aim to increase contract costs when on a % fee for financial gain.

About

Avatar for hugo7 @hugo7 started