-
We hired an expert because they know what they're doing and can get results. But he's less attached to original features than I am, and I'm just looking to strike a balance. That fireplace has been in the house since it was built 130 years ago and I think it would be nice to keep it here. It's an attractive thing and it's part of the history of the house. Nobody's had a fire in it for decades. I do appreciate that ditching the breast would make the room much bigger though, and am into that idea. Just trying to fumble my way through these decisions and am looking for some middle ground if it exists.
-
We hired an expert because they know what they're doing and can get results. But he's less attached to original features than I am, and I'm just looking to strike a balance. That fireplace has been in the house since it was built 130 years ago and I think it would be nice to keep it here. It's an attractive thing and it's part of the history of the house. Nobody's had a fire in it for decades.
Keep the fireplace and the chimney breast if you like it. The next owner will probably like the original features having been retaining too. Personally I think they should always be retained in a bedroom or a living unless it's really impinging on the plan. Kitchens are a different matter.
Sell it to an architectural salvage firm, profit, enjoy the space. That's what I'd do anyway.
As a general rule unless your architect is batshit it's probably a good idea to listen to them (it will look odd).