You are reading a single comment by @Regal and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • from a GMT to an Explorer II, a watch that I struggled to like originally but has really grown on me recently

    Its so weird, but im the same. Originally i didnt like it, but its grown on me and im not sure why. I dont know if its cause i cant stand the Rolex distribution/ sales issue so now willing to look at it, or if its cause im drawn to the ugly duckling, or if it looks more tool watch... It annoys me that i am, I feel betrayed by my feelings.

  • One thing with the Explorer II is I think the brushed steel bezel looks better than the cerachrom ones.

    The current one is too big for me, but that’s me.

    I reckon anyone in the market for an Explorer II should be checking out the GS series 9 titanium spring drive GMTs. They are better designed and better finished, and you can actually buy one. They're also a bit big for me but no bigger than an E2. The bracelet is really the only thing the Rolex has in its favour, objectively at least.


    2 Attachments

    • 3568B4B9-6395-4473-9382-00019DF23EF6.jpeg
    • FCCB766E-6BB2-4AF4-A2D1-3F0D7C7E0857.jpeg
  • I do like those GS, but i've got some weird aversion to a sports watch being shiny. To big up the Exp 2, it's 1.4m (ie 10%) thinner and sits flat, so no cuff issues. It's also effectively anti-mag and i suspect has better anti-shock too. It's deffo more a tool vibe, but that's why i liked it against the cerachrom crew. Come on @Dammit @ChainBreaker - come join the darkside :)

    (didn't once refer to resale values. Crap, just did).

  • Oh My...

    Is that Arial?

About

Avatar for Regal @Regal started