You are reading a single comment by @NotThamesWater and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Would be interesting to see what's caused the decision now (newly being sold in Europe/Belgium perhaps?). Of course I'm sure trademark/copyright laws are pretty complex, but it still seems like a pretty clear case IMO (I, not being a lawyer)

  • It's not trademark or copyright, though, is it?

    The usual boeuf is down to it being appellation d'origine contrôlée - you can't call fiizzy wine Champagne, unless it's from & made in the Champagne region, to specific standards.

    Or from a country / area that don't give a fuck, and is not governed by various trade agreements / other treaties - like parts of the US.

  • No idea on the trademark/copyright/protected name front. But considering the usual restrictions on alcoholic drinks being called champagne, it doesn't seem surprising that an alcoholic drink that doesn't meet the requirements is facing issues using the name.

About