-
Amazing, thanks for taking the time to look over it.
216 - A little gravel is ok I think that should be a pretty simple deviation, we have 5 days to cover the distance so it should be fine to get a little lost
254 - 25% on gravel, no thanks! amended to the road
398 - Well spotted, luckily there's a bike path around the outside
475 & 515 - noted and amendedAll relatively easy fixes, I feel a bit more confident with the route now - just need to map out potential stops and wild camping spots, then we're golden.
Really, thanks again!
MrBaklava-
It was just a quick glance at it. I didn't do a full check. But my method is basically to switch to OSM maps and look at gravel bits and/or high gradient bits to see if they can be routed around.
Also, if you draw the route in OSM, it should route you around a lot of "no bike" stuff. Google Map base isn't that clever.
hippy
In some spots, like 216km you have gravel shortcut rather than road. Is this intentional? I'd not do that if I was looking for speed - it's normally less drama and faster to stay on the road, even if the distance is higher.
254k too, eg 25% gravel climb rather than using the road
398km you're going through a tunnel marked "no bikes"
475km stick to bigger road, same with 515km unless you want the town?