-
Yep! You spend most of your time inside it anyway, and you can make it home. Plus all of our ideas of ugly / beauty change over time - that house isn’t intrinsically ugly, and in X years’ time it will be considered quaint or cool or desirable*
*see mid-century / 1970s / the third coming of flared jeans
-
Our house is hideous and makes me sad every time I look at it, but it’s in the right place and if it were any better it would have been financially beyond us. So in that regard ugly is a plus! Worst house in a good place is better than a good house in a bad place and all that.
Everything is redeemable with time and money, and having somewhere to live is quite handy. Getting angry at all the irrational choices of previous owners is a fun game to pass the time too, helps break up the crushing misery of it all.
-
Has anyone bought an extremely ugly house in a nice area?
May be worth pointing out that every generation or so, we considered building ugly but now acceptable or even embrace them.
Victorian terraced houses with two tiny front windows and zero front garden were deemed a horrorshow, especially the back to back terraced by the Victorian/Edwardian.
Nowadays, they gone for silly money like 500k right opposite our flat.
Point being, the LA council flats are ugly, but in 50 years time, our view may changed.
Has anyone bought an extremely ugly house in a nice area?
Can you learn to love one in time?
There's a house in an area we like, within our budget, with some really nice features, but it's really ugly (also needs a fair bit of work).
Grow some wisteria up it and it will all be fine? Or hold out for something that actually stirs the loins?
1 Attachment