You are reading a single comment by @kboy and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • It's not only propaganda, centuries of Russian geopolitics have been based on controlling a large enough area of the Northern European Steppe such that the avenues for largescale movement of armies into their territory is constrained by mountain ranges, rivers, etc. Basically, they want to limit the routes of tanks into Russia to topographical bottlenecks that they can easily plug. It sounds daft and may well be daft, but it's not entirely uninformed by history. When you understand that this is a key part of the Russian perspective, you see why NATO expansion into former Warsaw Pact countries is interpreted as aggression - the available routes for forces to enter Russia have become thousands of kilometers wide, Belarus is at risk of becoming an indefensible salient, etc. I'm not saying this is a correct or helpful way to view the world, because overall we will not progress by treating the planet like a giant game of Risk. However it does render some of the batshit comprehensible.

    Imagine how much of this shit could be avoided if people didn't get so excited about Clausewitz.

  • Seeking stable, secure borders is a really typical behaviour of land empires, so they probably think that would make them happy. I doubt it would, and often such expansionism leads to overstretched militaries and then collapse.

About

Avatar for kboy @kboy started