You are reading a single comment by @hurricane_run and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Surely in the public interest to see powerful people go to jail for conspiracy.
Oh I don't disagree. I was just remarking that she (Oakeshott) has a reputation/previous for not following the usual journalist's M.O. of protecting their sources. I think she is on record as constantly reassuring Pryce she would be in the clear and was then responsible for releasing the information that got her jailed too. So for Hancock to rely on her of all people to keep schtum about anything was a particularly poor piece of judgment to add to his increasingly large collection.
c00ps
@hurricane_run
Frankly given her track record with sources (ask Vicky Pryce what happens), it's a wonder anyone would trust her with any kind of information.
Surely in the public interest to see powerful people go to jail for conspiracy.