You are reading a single comment by @h2o and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I mean, it’s supposed to be very good, but I’m not sure the difference with the Sony would be obvious. Once you’re up to around 24-26 MP you’ve more than enough pixels for amateur (or even pro) use, and Sony make good sensors too.
This is helpful:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/ricoh-gr-iii/5Personally, I’d just go with whichever option I think would get me taking more photos and enjoying the process.
h2o
neu
Thanks both.
I was under the impression that the Ricoh sensor was particularly good, in particular that it has very good dynamic range? Are 24MP APS-C sensors much of a muchness to an amateur?
I guess what also draws of a lot of GR users are the effect filters, particularly positive film.
I think if I were buying anew I would go for the Ricoh, as I like the idea of a simple fun black box but selling the a6000 + sigma does feel like a sideways move, even though it's a lot cheaper.