You are reading a single comment by @slippers and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Tax avoidance to stimulate investment to help the economy is to me more useful than non Dom tax avoidance on personal assets that sit in property/bank accounts. One, if audited and tuned properly, creates jobs. The other just puts more £ in the pockets of one person.

    I don't know how you can say that with such certainty.

    The pro case for non-dom is that it brings people to live and work (partly) in the UK that otherwise would not be incentivised to as they would drag all of their global assets into the UK tax net. I don't think it's a particularly strong argument, but then I also think there's a load of tax-advantaged investment that doesn't stimulate the real economy.

  • (This twitter thread is worth a read: https://twitter.com/arunadvaniecon/statu­s/1621087079999639559)

    Unless I'm missing something, that thread doesn't answer the most interesting question, which is whether the non-dom policy really attracts anyone that wouldn't have come anyway.

    What it does seem to say is that the "bait and switch" approach is highly successful, i.e. increasing tax rates once people have already made the decision to come to the UK doesn't cause people to unwind their arrangements.

About

Avatar for slippers @slippers started