-
• #11377
Looks like it’s missing a something- the little concave nylon washer in the pic.
1 Attachment
-
• #11378
Yep it does. Which brings me to the "what now?", I'd have thought a new thru axle compatible with the screw pitch on the other side? Or a new wheel.
-
• #11379
Could get a new washer
-
• #11380
have you got an old qr you can pull apart to get the washer and concave bit?
-
• #11381
Zip tie it closed.
-
• #11382
Or new bike.
-
• #11383
My guy.
-
• #11384
Or new bike.
I'm not a golf club member -
• #11385
+1 to this!
-
• #11386
Yep it does. Which brings me to the "what now?", I'd have thought a new thru axle compatible with the screw pitch on the other side? Or a new wheel.
I can't see what benefit a new wheel would bring, as you'd still need a thru axle to fit it. Is there any reason why you can't just buy a generic thru axle to replace the existing one?
I've checked my parts box, and I don't have a Novatec QR thru axle, I'm afraid. That being said, the hub won't know what make of thru axle is being used. As long as it's the right length, and has the right thread at the end, the hub doesn't care.
-
• #11388
Benefit - me neither
New axle - yeah, it's the pitch at the end isn't it?I think because finding a generic axle might be tricky it's easier to do the wheel path.
-
• #11389
it's easier to do the wheel path.
Axles are bike/fork specific now darling, your new wheel wouldn't come with one. Robert axle project linked to above seem to make the biggest variety, although often ain't the cheapest.
-
• #11390
I have become Dammit.
-
• #11391
no ones stopping you from buying a Thru axle then building a bike around it
-
• #11392
I think because finding a generic axle might be tricky it's easier to do the wheel path.
BrandX ones from Wiggle or CRC seem fine provided you can get the right length and thread.
-
• #11393
Thanks again!
-
• #11394
Planning my first wheelbuild was wondering if someone wouldnt mind checking over my plan for a dt r460 / formula front hub build?
@M_V mentioned the r460s had a difference in stated ERD @ 596mm (595.5 on freespoke) and measured ERD @ 592mm, was planning on just using a calculator and ordering a formula hub and some sapim race at whatever length it calculated.
With the freespoke calc and 32 hole, 3 cross, formula front hub, I get 288.1 using the stated ERD and 286.4 for M_Vs measured ERD. Does this sound about right to order some 286mm spokes? or do I need to get measuring myself?
Cheers! -
• #11395
592 is about right if you use conventional nipples, as opposed to the Torx ones, or whatever they are called.
I havent calculated, but the spokes seem a tiny bit short for a 32 3 cross. I seem to recall that Archetype, same ERD used to build front at 290 with most hubs… but then again, been a long time… -
• #11396
592 is about right if you use conventional nipples, as opposed to the Torx ones, or whatever they are called.
How does nipple choice affect erd?
I thought the difference might be washers v no washers.
-
• #11397
The squorx nipples by DT need different spoke length, as i understand, so that is built in the ERD for convenience. i am not sure this is the case for DT 460 though. Pretty sure it is for the 511, as they came with those nipples when I ordered them
-
• #11398
Hmmm, changing the erd seems like poor form, it’s bound to create confusion as this discussion shows.
The erd should be the erd and the nipples should come with a disclaimer to increase calculated spoke lengths by Xmm.
-
• #11399
This deserves some recognition.
-
• #11400
agree, but their point is that those rims should be built with those nipples… i didnt use them because they dont work with a conventional spoke key
Yes, that's the one.
But the lever doesn't lock in after tightening and every now and again I have to give the whole thing a tighten. Which doesn't feel optimal.