You are reading a single comment by @yoshy and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Ah right, t'other page said json for sure, and looking again gives example.

    Reading your link "gtfs" might be better to use? Fuck knows now, feels like I'm starting all over again.

  • Reading your link "gtfs" might be better to use?

    I think GTFS is a specification the transport companies should stick to when publishing this data, not a different way of accessing the data, if that makes sense?
    So when the initial doc page said "Results are returned as JSON.", it was wrong. Really, the data adheres to GTFS and is therefore going to be .xml. Unless maybe you force it to be json like greenbank is saying and I was garbling through on the last page

  • I think that makes sense,although a quick m Google gives info on gtfs -> json conversion?

    It's a whole new day of learning I think and I can usually focus on this only once every few months at best 🤔

About

Avatar for yoshy @yoshy started