You are reading a single comment by @JWestland and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Thanks. I agree, best to wait for the details.
Do you think the S*n and Reform/Braverman/Farage wait for the fine details...I think not ;)
JWestland-
No, but you're the one who said they didn't understand the the ruling, not them. ;)
I mean TBH I don't think the Guardian is any better. Look at their coverage of the Ched Evans case.
-
Do you think the S*n and Reform/Braverman/Farage wait for the fine details...I think not ;)
They will need to find a way to square the circle of celebrating this result while still complaining about "woke lefty lawyers", "enemies of the people" etc etc
hugo7
NickCJ
TBH you pretty much can't make a view on any judgement from reading articles in papers.
Best best is to wait for the judgement to be released and then read that. It may simply be that they think it's too controversial so they're kicking it up to the next court knowing the judgement will be appealed.
Or tweet at the secret barrister for a layman's version.