You are reading a single comment by @Cupcakes and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Because the concept of one doesn't really exist?

    But reasons for not shoving more money down a RICS person's throat

    • it's not your first rodeo
    • you've got a better alternative (builder etc)
    • low risk or inability to action whatever they might find (i.e. it's a flat in a purpose built block that hasn't been wrapped in stuff that burns and not made out of out of date concrete)
    • defects are so terrifyingly obvious that you've already got a structural engineer picking through the rubble

    or combinations of thereof

  • Interesting, and not unreasonable I think.

    Inspection reports from structural engineers do exist though. Edit: comes under (2) in your list I guess.

  • they can't really do much unless they can peel thing back and have a look or they have access to documentation on what was done and how. Much more involved process than what the RICS folks offer through basically eyeballing a place and using local knowledge etc, which I think is what folks assume a 'structural survey' to be. Erroneously.

About

Avatar for Cupcakes @Cupcakes started