Totally agree that a series of images can be more conclusive. Was just pointing out that one image - particularly the photo which has been doing the rounds - can only prove that a ball was out, not that it didn't go out.
Don't understand the image you posted. It's obviously a reconstruction, but based on what since there's no ball tracking in this situation?
Surprisingly, the best evidence I've seen is on twitter, which if you run it fullscreen allows you to scrub frame-by-frame. Anyone still arguing it's out after seeing that doesn't understand either geometry or the rules.
Totally agree that a series of images can be more conclusive. Was just pointing out that one image - particularly the photo which has been doing the rounds - can only prove that a ball was out, not that it didn't go out.
Don't understand the image you posted. It's obviously a reconstruction, but based on what since there's no ball tracking in this situation?
Surprisingly, the best evidence I've seen is on twitter, which if you run it fullscreen allows you to scrub frame-by-frame. Anyone still arguing it's out after seeing that doesn't understand either geometry or the rules.