It's interesting in the way it shows that when the situation is so clearly win - win - then why not. No one loses out. On balance, these players have been a force for good. It fair to point out though, that as soon as the equation is win-lose, these players are fine to lower their moral standards. Not a single player in world football has (as far as I'm aware) ruled themselves out of this tournament on ethical grounds.
At the same time - and what the article misses completely- is that they're just people who have worked their entire lives in the hope of playing at the pinnacle of the sport - so who could begrudge them that experience. Is it their role to sacrifice all that effort at the altar of a political statement? Shouldn't that job be done by those who claim to care for the sport as a whole? I think so.
The one guy who can certainly get in the bin is David Beckham. Joe Lycett's got that one bang on.
Agree it's not the whole picture.
It's interesting in the way it shows that when the situation is so clearly win - win - then why not. No one loses out. On balance, these players have been a force for good. It fair to point out though, that as soon as the equation is win-lose, these players are fine to lower their moral standards. Not a single player in world football has (as far as I'm aware) ruled themselves out of this tournament on ethical grounds.
At the same time - and what the article misses completely- is that they're just people who have worked their entire lives in the hope of playing at the pinnacle of the sport - so who could begrudge them that experience. Is it their role to sacrifice all that effort at the altar of a political statement? Shouldn't that job be done by those who claim to care for the sport as a whole? I think so.
The one guy who can certainly get in the bin is David Beckham. Joe Lycett's got that one bang on.