You are reading a single comment by @itsbruce and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • So the backers have no right to beef if they lose out, because bankrolling the next unicorn is just a casino. The backers are greedy and deserve to fail sometimes. Was that how Bernie Madoff thought?

    I don't want to come across as a Theranos apologist (because I genuinely am not) but if people did not invest what they could not afford to lose the impact of this sort of shitshow would be far less. Most business investments lose money after all. There is definitely an element of people being exploited but also, allowing themselves to be exploited in this.

  • Some of the unwise investors were pension funds, which means that a significant number of ordinary people hurt by this weren't themselves the risk takers. Or are they to blame for not doing enough due diligence in researching the wisdom of their pension fund managers. Just how far do you want to take this?

    Most people are not investment-savvy. That doesn't make fraud less of a crime. If anything, it makes the case for heavy punishment of fraud.

  • Your logic seems really flawed. Of course 'ordinary people' who got hurt are taking a risk by trusting a pension fund to manage their money. They might not be lacking due diligence but 'past performance does not guarantee future income'.

About

Avatar for itsbruce @itsbruce started