• It was $8/mo.

    So 10mm users would be just shy of $1bn/year.

    But, yeah, little chance of that happening even before the recent fuckups.

    I read elsewhere that there were only ~2300 unique advertisers on Twitter even before all of this shit kicked off. FB have >3M unique advertisers so my guess is this opportunity is what Musk saw in Twitter (if it wasn't just an impulse "because I can" purchase.)

    (I wouldn't know about Twitter adverts, the client I use shows its own adverts at the bottom of the screen, that don't get in the way, and I've never seen a promoted tweet or had tweets display in anything other than chronological order.)

    I think technology is ripe for a middle ground between batshit-insane-mega-capitalist-Unicorns and donation-or-patreon-funded-OSS.

    Imagine Twitter run as a not-for-profit with minimal advertising, a sensible sized workforce that will never make it big with options but will have decent benefits and work culture, etc and a genuine goal of removing hate-speech and misinformation.

  • so 10mm users would be just shy of $1bn/year.

    Damnit - order of magnitude calculation fail. Anyway - I still would find it hard to believe that the number of daily users who'll pay can be close to making it worthwhile.

About