Then, to the extent that a pool of privately-owned rental stock is desirable, increasing the blended cost of capital for landlords (by banning mortgages) is going to make rents even less affordable than they are today, ceteris paribus.
I disagree, the effect of banning mortgages for 2nd homes would be to significantly reduce the value of property because fewer people would be able to afford to buy a 500k house with a 50k deposit. Prices would adjust for that. More tenants would be able to buy a home. There would be fewer tenants paying landlord's mortgages.
I do largely agree with your point though. It requires huge investment in housing to make anything like this work.
Prices would adjust for that. More tenants would be able to buy a home.
There's always a tension in this argument. The strata of better-off tenants would have a better chance of buying their own place, I agree, but there is a less well-off bucket of tenants that would do worse.
Are those worse off tenants really that much worse off if they have secure long term tenancies with no no fault evictions , rent controls and minimal risk of unfair rent raises meaning that they can stay in their homes for decades and will always be paying affordable rent?
I disagree, the effect of banning mortgages for 2nd homes would be to significantly reduce the value of property because fewer people would be able to afford to buy a 500k house with a 50k deposit. Prices would adjust for that. More tenants would be able to buy a home. There would be fewer tenants paying landlord's mortgages.
I do largely agree with your point though. It requires huge investment in housing to make anything like this work.