Also lastname remains horrible patriarchal bullshit in my mind. I'm amazed so many women continue to take their husbands name on marriage.
Often it is easier, especially with children involved. Or, to put it the other way, keeping a maiden name can introduce a whole load of difficulties.
Various friends have children with different surnames to a parent and it's a considerable pain in the arse at various borders/hotels/etc.
Using a shortened first name is tricky enough for me. My birth certificate and health records don't match my passport/driving-license/etc which is fine most of the time but causes problems with Covid/travel related things.
Isn't just that a woman can do it FOC but a man has to pay? Or did I hear that wrong? Not that it would be a strong enough deterrent for a couple wanting to do it that way, but if it's correct it's a baked in aspect of patriarchy.
When my wife went to her consulate after we got married to update her paperwork, she was informed that her new name was Mrs [Father’s Surname] [Mother’s Surname] de [Rodan]. She was taken aback that she didn’t have a choice, but it’s standard for some South American countries.
Just to point out that either partner can change their name when they marry.
But if a wife takes her husbands name the marriage certificate is the only paperwork needed. The other way it's deed poll time (not that that is especially difficult).
Often it is easier, especially with children involved. Or, to put it the other way, keeping a maiden name can introduce a whole load of difficulties.
Various friends have children with different surnames to a parent and it's a considerable pain in the arse at various borders/hotels/etc.
Using a shortened first name is tricky enough for me. My birth certificate and health records don't match my passport/driving-license/etc which is fine most of the time but causes problems with Covid/travel related things.
P.S. Fuck the Tories.