Functional bikes. Not Porn not Anti

Posted on
Page
of 1,122
First Prev
/ 1,122
Last Next
  • A touring bike without guards is a contradiction in terms.

  • It does have custom racks and lowrider and a hub dynamo at least

  • Tbh, it’s not unheard of for a touring bike without a mudguard, like this guys who currently touring in Mongolia.


    1 Attachment

    • 4773CCEE-575D-498C-8CF9-691BBAA61D7C.jpeg
  • Trussonomics....

  • Outside the scope of regular 'touring' Ed. He's been on more of an expedition for the past 5 years or so...

  • More than half of my cycle touring is off-road where mudguards would be a hindrance and big tyres are everything, road touring is dull.

  • That’s kinda the thing, would we says a Trek FX1 not a touring bike cause it only got a rear rack and marathon plus?

    It’s all subjective, I’d removed mudguard for off road touring.

  • My point wasn't on touring dude. Tour on whatever the fuck you want and with mudguards or not.
    My point was that he, and his bike, are not a prime example of how your average person tours. Little biased.
    He's of a very small percentage of people that have been on the road for multiple years.

  • i tour on 23c track tubs and 98 gear inches idk about you lot

  • While the person is not a prime example, the bike isn’t too dissimilar to other who go touring, like this;


    1 Attachment

    • DD1D9BB4-F403-411D-AAE8-EFA09F839A5D.jpeg
  • What’s that bike?

  • Surly LHT I believe.

  • Sorry I meant the one above

  • Link please ;-)

  • I didn't go to Bespoked but if I got my facts right the ‘best touring bike’ was Simon Wellers Custom Clandestine


    1 Attachment

    • 292754742_572139714468328_1751388439181508569_n.jpg
  • You'll be telling me next it was 1x, I do despair at what we've become.

    This is the real crime.

  • Tbf I'm not sure I'd call that a 'touring bike', classically. Wouldn't fancy that gearing on a loaded tour on or off road (unless my eyes arent seeing that right).

  • Yup.

    Cheers @Oddo , hadn't seen it before, I quite like it, bang a double, or even a triple and a slightly smaller cassette on. Sorted

    And, obviously, some mudguards.

  • I actually met a tourer who quite like his 11 speed 11-36t when he paired with a 42/28 chainset, if worst come to worse, he just put a 11-42t on it.

    (most Shimano derailleur can handle a 11-40t with a 16t jump chainring nowadays, even 105 R7000).

  • Close. Been running 42/26 x 11-40 this summer; it's awesome.

  • I’ve ridden this Roberts (to test ride after a service) with a 50/40/30 chainset, I have to says I genuinely miss a good triple, that gearing would be 100% perfect for alpine climb.


    1 Attachment

    • 8CB0734F-BCBA-49C5-A8C2-BE96658E52A7.jpeg
  • Good old Spa Cycles! I literally just cut the guard to get the front derailleur to work better.

  • Give it a few years dude. Triples will be back. Or at least doubles.
    So easy to set up. So little problems, so many gears.

    Love my XT 44/32

  • So easy to set up.

    That’s the thing, only recently I was able to get a triple to work with the trims and zero chain rub (Sora triple for example), I always expected a little chain rub or two but zero on the modern triple.

    Plus, with 11+ speed, there’s very little need for it nowadays when it offer a big range without a massive gap between each sprocket, having said that, would be great to have an almost straight block with a triple 11 speed drivetrain.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Functional bikes. Not Porn not Anti

Posted by Avatar for lessmann @lessmann

Actions