I understand what you're saying, but there are better ways of achieving what you want than embedding 6.6GB of images in a thread, (some of which are up to 10k pixels wide), just in case someone decides they want to open an image in a new tab.
For context, Google photos, flickr, 500px, Facebook, imgur; none of them offer unlimited original size image hosting for free.*
I understand what you're saying, but there are better ways of achieving what you want than embedding 6.6GB of images in a thread, (some of which are up to 10k pixels wide), just in case someone decides they want to open an image in a new tab.
For context, Google photos, flickr, 500px, Facebook, imgur; none of them offer unlimited original size image hosting for free.*
* maximum rep to boss man and all lufguss donors