You are reading a single comment by @Sumo and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Sumo-
Initiatives that foster social progress either cost taxpayer money, require governmentally enforced regulation, or both. If there’s no social progress funding, there’s no social progress.
After he contradicted himself in his first paragraph I kind of lost interest. If you accept that governmentally-enforced regulation can foster social progress then I don't see why supporting such regulation (or deregulation) cannot in and of itself be described as progressive.
NickCJ
who is Mike Epifani?