You are reading a single comment by @ketsbaia and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Whether or not he's handsy at parties is not what's in question here.

    Except that it is. That's what the law states. Both in statute and precedent.

    He could argue in a court that constant repetition of that fact is defamatory

    Which would be correct.

    he presumably realised that might open him up to having to prove he isn't

    No he wouldn't - the onus is on the person making (or repeating) the statement to demonstrate that it is true.

  • No he wouldn't - the onus is on the person making (or repeating) the statement to demonstrate that it is true.

    That person could simply point at the list and say: "There it is, your honour. Here is his name and next to it is the allegation."

  • That would mean I could anonymously write a document saying "Jeremy Corbyn is a pedo" and then put an article on the front page of the Daily Mail saying "Document says Jeremy Corbyn is a pedo" with Jeremy Corbyn having no legal recourse against me.

    Newspapers could say absolutely anything as long as they "found" a document saying it beforehand

About

Avatar for ketsbaia @ketsbaia started