-
RU state media keeps freaking out about ATACMS missile systems because they have the range to take out all the rail links and bridges to everywhere in Crimea
I really believe, without any knowledge of it, that the provision of those systems to Ukraine comes with a "do not use these across the Russian border (as the border stood a decade ago)" or something to that effect.
NATO do not want to be pulled in... have the tools, but moderate the use to avoid pulling NATO in.
But yeah, that Crimea bridge is going to be hit soon, as well as rail lines within Ukraine.
-
And (as we both follow those in the know on twitter) once the supply lines are narrowed and concentrated even further and the rain comes those Alibaba fake Michelins will start rolling off whatever equipment they have left for re-supply.
Demoralised reserves with no winter equipment, intermittent supply of food/ammunition, knowing that sitting near any ordinance just increases your chance of being Himarsed instead of offering protection as you try to fight a despots unjust war in a country you likely have no personal agency in.
what’s the worst that can happen...
You are reading a single comment by @dubtap and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Velocio
Mr_Smyth
@dubtap
It won't matter how many soldiers he calls up if they can't supply them with food fuel and ammo. This is why RU state media keeps freaking out about ATACMS missile systems because they have the range to take out all the rail links and bridges to everywhere in Crimea etc. HIMARS range vs ATACMS below
1 Attachment