• Just love the fact we're going to throw £100 billion worth of taxpayers' money to prop up a non-market when we could spend £2.9 billion nationalising it and solving the problem overnight. Great work, neoliberalism. Tremendous stuff.

  • That doesn't make much sense. The gas companies are making record profits and effectively getting £100bn subsidised revenue plus plenty more on top of that but could be bought for £2.9bn?

  • Yes. Nationalising the big five energy retailers would cost 2.85 billion. Admittedly according to the TUC, but they won't be a billion miles away. Even if it's 10 times that, it's still less than the six-month sticking plaster Starmer's proposed (which has, unsurprisingly, already been outflanked on the left by the Tories).

    E2a: that 100 billion subsidised revenue melts away if they're in public ownership. The profits come into the state rather than shareholders. Costed up, I reckon you're looking at a net gain over the long term rather than a cost. A cost that would still benefit the British public way more than us all ploughing loads of our money into energy company shareholders' pockets.

About

Avatar for aggi @aggi started