You are reading a single comment by @aggi and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Ah, 1 in 100 does indeed sound quite risky. I assumed it was much better than that.

    Even transporting waste via rail or road requires a container that would survive any conceivable surface level collision. If you apply that philosophy to a space launch... well you looking at a very uneconomical ratio of container to waste, even if rocket launches were thousands of times more likely to be successful.

About

Avatar for aggi @aggi started