You are reading a single comment by @Howard and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Ah, 1 in 100 does indeed sound quite risky. I assumed it was much better than that.
Even transporting waste via rail or road requires a container that would survive any conceivable surface level collision. If you apply that philosophy to a space launch... well you looking at a very uneconomical ratio of container to waste, even if rocket launches were thousands of times more likely to be successful.
Howard
aggi
Ah, 1 in 100 does indeed sound quite risky. I assumed it was much better than that.