You are reading a single comment by @Greenbank and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Assuming that a “penalty charge” for excess speed would be a magistrate court appeal, I think any lawyer worth his salt could get the fine cancelled on the basis that cyclists do not have speedometers and therefore cannot be held accountable for their speed to any reasonable standard. However, for personal injury cases, speed may be used as a contributing factor, I suppose as now. IANAL

  • cyclists do not have speedometers and therefore cannot be held accountable for their speed to any reasonable standard.

    This argument doesn't work.

    Cars aren't fitted with blood alcohol meters, yet you can still get prosecuted for drink driving. It's up to the individual to be responsible for their actions, speeding would be covered in the same way.

  • But a non-working speedometer in a car is an MOT fail, suggesting its presence is an important part of a road-legal vehicle.

  • You know if you've had a drink, you don't know exactly what speed you're going.

About

Avatar for Greenbank @Greenbank started