None of the proposed actions are for prevention just accountability.
Its quite the fence to straddle, nothing really wrong with accountability through registration, insurance etc but is mostly un needed except for when its very clearly needed.
Kind of like "may contain nuts" written on bags of peanuts.
It's a question of whether the impact is disproportionate, isn't it? If it costs a bomb, is restrictive on liberties or puts people off, then the question is whether it is worth it for the purported (not demonstrated) effects.
That would be my main concern, if such a law was passed, fewer people would see cycling as a viable alternative to other modes of transport.
Really flagged up the Daily Mail for the headline, what a shitpit of a newspaper it really is.
None of the proposed actions are for prevention just accountability.
Its quite the fence to straddle, nothing really wrong with accountability through registration, insurance etc but is mostly un needed except for when its very clearly needed.
Kind of like "may contain nuts" written on bags of peanuts.