You are reading a single comment by @jupiz and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Unfortunately as part of the scientific method, peer review often relies on a person to look at a fairly dense piece of information in minuscule detail in their spare time, for free with normally short turnarounds. It’s no surprise if things like image manipulation aren’t picked upon unless they’re jumping out the page
jupiz
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm no scientist. I would have thought that validation is central to its integrity though.