-
The guy admits he is a libertarian so he will be looking to limit the role of governments or other 3rd parties in his life; small state, low tax, less services provided free at the point of access. He may think there is some utopia out there where everyone binds together and things get better with out a governmental structure but, even if he dresses and talks like a skater, he is a fin tech CEO born into high finance so I doubt it.
Not really sure what you're getting at here? Whether he thinks the NHS is a shit idea or not, he's still working on an incredible tool of value exchange that anyone with a smartphone could theoretically access (and Strike isn't the only app to do it).
-
I thought the quote in my comment have it context sorry. My point is that, as a lot of tech innovation has matured, the potential to do good has been lost as the big players, who burned investors cash to corner or create markets early on, squeeze everything for profit. Uber is a great example and the recently leaked emails show this was always the plan. Lighting would be more likely to go that way, cornered by a single company and squeezed to death.
The guy admits he is a libertarian so he will be looking to limit the role of governments or other 3rd parties in his life; small state, low tax, less services provided free at the point of access. He may think there is some utopia out there where everyone binds together and things get better with out a governmental structure but, even if he dresses and talks like a skater, he is a fin tech CEO born into high finance so I doubt it.
On another note, no matter how fast his transactions are, there must be a change in vale of BTC between the initial buy and the sell. Volume would make this not insignificant. Anyone know how they are managing that? Create a margin in the sale as a buffer. Come to think of it, he is selling it as a no cost transaction, how does his company plan to make a profit? Pull an Uber?