-
Probably yes. Corbyn did seem to struggle at controlling the various elements of the party and probably did need to be a bit more personally ruthless, even if that involved getting rid of people.
The whole thing reads like a shitshow with factions more focussed on battling each other and everything being a weapon rather than being dealt with sensibly. Anti-semitism was the most obvious example with one faction suggesting that it was all a big conspiracy and the other faction suggesting it was a giant issue whereas in reality it needed to be accepted it was an issue, deal with it and move on.
To be honest I assumed that most of the senior non-elected staff from that period had been shuffled out, are a lot still in?
So he should have sacked them, then?