You are reading a single comment by @Stonehedge and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
So he should have sacked them, then?
If they had done something illegal or against the rules, yes. Otherwise, he should have stopped the infighting from happening in the first place, which he didn't. Either way is a failure of leadership.
Stonehedge-
Oh, don't get me wrong, I don't think he led at all well in this respect. I think he should have been as 'Stalinist' as he was accused of being and told the lot to either work with him or get fucked. That he didn't do this quite probably emboldened his detractors, something countless anonymous briefings and staged resignations, etc. would have no doubt reinforced.
ketsbaia
So he should have sacked them, then?