-
I’ve tried to engage in your perspective in measure terms. That doesn’t seem to fit with your narrative though and, ironically, only strengthens the position of an historically incompetent, dishonest and corrupt government. Forget the process, look at the outcome.
Specifically responding to your post, anyone who does not take your absolute perspective you dismiss in derogatory terms. So, yes, sneering is not helpful apart from, as above, for the government as it plays into “they are disorganised communists controlled by the Union barons” BS narrative. And that repels the floating voters that needs to be meaningfully engaged in making a change.
I’m not sure why you continue to associate me with Kier Starmer - it’s absolutely possible that it’s not a binary choice - but if you want to continue down that route drop me a PM and I’ll put you in touch with my wife who has first hand experience of “Stalinist purges” that lead to disappearance, fake names, political prisoners and political parties that are outlawed to this day.
I’ve listened to and respected your truth. Listen to others. Or carry on down your own rabbit hole. Choice is yours.
Big_Ted-
Mate, all I know is I was fighting an election to get rid of the Tories and this report shows there were cunts in the party at the highest level doing their best to lose it. Not only do I feel ripped off because the subs I paid were wasted, I also resent the fact I walked the streets trying to persuade people to vote for a better future when the cunts now in charge of Labour were doing their level best to undermine that.
The people now in charge are purging left-wing members of the party under false pretences and on spurious grounds. What do you call that? Because those currently in charge of the party would have called it 'Stalinist' had it been practised by the former leadership. And they, in fact, did call it that on numerous occasions. You have a problem with the language? Take it up with them.
Me? I've had to listen to others giving it the 'tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist' nonsense for the last six years. Now I've been vindicated, at least afford me the fucking respect to ram it down the throats of people who called me a crank for it.
This is not directed at you personally. And I'm not personally associating you with Starmer. But if you support what he did and what those he is associated with did having seen the independent evidence that proves it and you're still OK with that, then I reckon it's not me who has to worry about rabbit holes, frankly.
ketsbaia
I'm doing anything but sneer at people who don't agree with me. All I'm doing is pointing to an independent report that states unequivocally one side of the Labour party colluded with the media to undermine its own chances at two previous general elections and funnelled campaign money away from winnable seats (which could have changed the result) and towards safe seats held by MPs from their own faction.
Why that isn't a fucking national scandal is beyond me. I don't give two hoots whether people aren't feeling it. It's a fucking disgrace. Essentially the people in charge of the Labour Party currently figured diamond-hard Brexit and Boris Johnson was a price worth paying for them taking back control of the party. Fuck those cunts.
E2a: I mean, do you reckon the last five years have been worth it? Just to get a Brylcreemed nonentity and his coterie of mooing Blairite 90s tribute wankers back in charge of the opposition?