You are reading a single comment by @leggy_blonde and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • This bases itself on a possibly false, and sadly unprovable assumption- the theory that years trained as a child outweigh years trained as an adult.
    Whilst there is obviously no good science, there is significant anecdotal evidence that this is a fallacy.
    Add to this the amount he trains- have a look at his Strava, it is bonkers- and the guy is clearly dedicated.
    No amount of money makes up for those hours in the saddle, and the fact that he can, and probably has self-funded this far is not something to discredit him by.

    I'm not going to dive into the doping question. I think the complexity of professional sport is too great, and frankly a suspension of disbelief makes the whole thing enjoyable to watch again. [Any sport]

  • The guy is clearly a wanker

    Which obviously doesn't mean he is a doper.

    What is interesting is that he has had a meteoric rise but only does well when left to his own devices, he never lasts long in teams. Now that could be due to his personality!

About