-
It is “religion” but not religion. If it were, as I said, there surely would be more compassion after the baby is born. You can’t have it both ways.
For anyone capable of logical thought being against abortion cannot co-exist with almost every other aspect of US social care and also align with any existing religious belief that I know of.
-
For anyone capable of logical thought
There's your problem, religion addled minds. The problem is religion, not the specific religions themselves (although they're all stupid) and not necessarily those who believe in their chosen folly, but religion is the method and the catalyst that allows awful cunts to bend and shape the minds of gullible cunts into thinking things that are directly bad for them are what they want.
-
I think you confuse religious reality with the benign stories that religious groups like to tell about themselves. There will of course be compassion towards people in their in-group even if they are paedophiles or murderers. Most Christians in western societies are mostly in it for the holidays and maybe have some left over esoteric belief in a god but don't really live their lives
according to Christian dogmas. You can see that often in the outrage when a Pope says something stupid about women or homosexuality.People who don't believe themselves will have a harder time understanding that others might
believe.For anyone capable of logical thought
any existing religious beliefyou can't have it both.
I mostly agree with you, but it's religion that let's people convince themselves and others that controlling women's bodies is being "pro life" while also denying gun control. It's religion that people use to say life starts at conception and there are hugely wealthy and powerful religious organisations that have been using that phrase to lobby for controlling women's bodies.