You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Guns and abortion aren't remotely analogous.
If you want a useful contradiction it is how preventing the "killing" of unborn children is of utmost importance, but prevention of them "just dying" through poverty and lack of access to appropriate treatment is just how it is.
Even then one is active and one is passive, so still not ideal.
hugo7-
I'd argue both are active - as some of (edited) those in power work very hard to ensure there is no wealth trickle-down and actively engage in stopping social mobility. Therefore poverty, definitely in certain demographics, is a direct and purposeful consequence of policy. Healthcare is also withheld on purpose as a result of policy and business practice.
Tl;dr harm and death by neglect is still a wilful act.
c00ps
I mostly agree with you, but it's religion that let's people convince themselves and others that controlling women's bodies is being "pro life" while also denying gun control. It's religion that people use to say life starts at conception and there are hugely wealthy and powerful religious organisations that have been using that phrase to lobby for controlling women's bodies.